Genesys CTI User Forum

Genesys CTI User Forum => Announcements Scratch Board => Topic started by: victor on February 25, 2016, 08:40:11 AM

Title: Do we need a facelift?
Post by: victor on February 25, 2016, 08:40:11 AM
Guys,

I am used to this site format and majority of the sites I use are pretty much similar. I am told that we might benefit from a facelift or moving to something like https://github.com/discourse/discourse

I really do not see the difference. If anything, it feels as turning the site into huge Whatsapp-like repository. Of course, I am always behind on everything when it comes to common sense, so would love to hear your input.

Vic
Title: Re: Do we need a facelift?
Post by: cavagnaro on February 25, 2016, 01:10:11 PM
For me this is totally functional. Maybe an option to mark an answer as best one only to guide new users
Title: Re: Do we need a facelift?
Post by: Adam G on February 26, 2016, 05:27:06 PM
...I second what cav said.  Good idea to have a topic marked "answered" for search purposes.
Title: Re: Do we need a facelift?
Post by: Kubig on February 29, 2016, 01:53:57 PM
Agree with all.. Maybe the function like "whisper" which will highlight the topics with same or very equivalent subject/thema while posting the new topic. It should prevent the duplicating topics or creating topics which have been answered before indirectly.
Title: Re: Do we need a facelift?
Post by: Adam G on July 13, 2016, 04:32:25 PM
I know this topic is old but I had another thought, along the same lines as others in this thread;

If there were a means to metatag/hashtag a topic which has an identified element (solution, platform, application, etc.) with a clear question and a full resolution, that would help people narrow down searches, too.

Obviously no point it marking things retrospectively, because most things go out of date within about a year, but a good way of marking things up, moving forwards...?
Title: Re: Do we need a facelift?
Post by: Tambo on July 18, 2016, 08:13:32 AM
what about a listing per application  IRD, CCPulse , OCS etc  and as Adam says too much work retrospectively but moving forward ?  will give a better way to find threads rather than search.